Drug interchangeability: an integrative review on pharmaceutical equivalence and clinical evidence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69849/zp183686

Keywords:

Generic drugs, Bioequivalence, Pharmaceutical equivalence, Drug interchangeability, Health regulation

Abstract

The interchangeability between generic and reference drugs is a pillar of public health policies in Brazil. In order to systematize the available scientific evidence on the subject, an integrative literature review was conducted including publications from 2020 to 2025, in Portuguese and English, obtained from PubMed/MEDLINE, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Of the 146 studies initially identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria and constitute the final analysis. The results showed that, in most studies, generic drugs presented pharmacokinetic parameters, especially Cmax and AUC, within the range of 80% to 125%, confirming bioequivalence with their respective reference products. In clinical outcomes such as cure rates, mortality, and adverse events, no statistically significant differences were observed. However, the review highlighted the limitations of the average bioequivalence (ABE) methodology in specific subpopulations and for narrow therapeutic index drugs. It is concluded that interchangeability between generics and reference drugs is scientifically grounded and safe, with consistent evidence across several therapeutic classes.

References

ALTOUM, G. H. et al. A comparative study on vildagliptin brand and its generic equivalents using dissolution test as quality control measure tool. Scientific Reports, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 1, 2024. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/XXXXXXXX/. Acesso em: 10 dez. 2025.

BRASIL. Lei n. 9.787, de 10 de fevereiro de 1999. Dispõe sobre a bioequivalência e a biodisponibilidade de medicamentos. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 11 fev. 1999. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9787.htm

CARDENAS-ESCUDERO, J. et al. Determination of bioequivalence between generic and reference drugs using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Analytica Chimica Acta, v. 1329, p. 343253, 2024. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39396312/.

CHIA, C.-Y.; HSIAO, F.-C.; HSU, T.-J.; TUNG, Y.-C.; LIN, C.-P.; CHU, P.-H. Clinical outcomes and safety profiles of generic versus brand-name clopidogrel in patients following coronary artery stent placement. Clinical and Translational Science, v. 18, n. 2, p. e70143, 2025. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39868895/.

COTIA, A. et al. Clinical equivalence between generic versus branded antibiotics: systematic review and meta-analysis. Antibiotics, v. 12, n. 5, p. 935, 2023. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37237838/.

Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39256193/.

GLERUM, P. J.; YAMADA, W. M.; NEELY, M. N.; BURGER, D. M.; MALIEPAARD, M.; NEEF, C. Interchangeability of generic drugs for subpopulations: bioequivalence simulation from a nonparametric PK model of gabapentin generic drugs. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, v. 90, n. 7, p. 1576-1585, jul. 2024. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15629. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36482842/.

LECHAT, P. Interchangeability between generic and reference products: limits of average bioequivalence methodology. European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, 2022. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35986193/.

MA, P. et al. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison between generic and brand-name levofloxacin based on Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, [s. l.], v. 33, p. 120–129, 2023. Disponível em: Acesso em: 10 dez. 2025.

NOSKOV, S. et al. Bioequivalence and Safety of Generic Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Compared to a Branded Product: A Randomized, Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 12, p. 1331–1338, 2024. Disponível em: Acesso em: 10 dez. 2025.

RIZEA-SAVU, S.; et al. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of a generic Ticagrelor 90-mg formulation versus the innovator product in healthy white subjects under fasting conditions. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development, v. 14, n. 1, p. 59–64, 2024.

SCHNAARS, Y.; GAIKWAD, S.; GOTTWALD-HOSTALEK, U.; KLINGBERG, U.; VADLA, H. K. C.; PRATHAP, V. R.; et al. Bioequivalence studies of new generic formulations of Vildagliptin and fixed-drug combination of Vildagliptin and Metformin versus respective originator products in healthy volunteers. Diabetes Therapy, v. 13, n. 6, p. 1215–1229, 2022. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35543870/.

SCHNAARS, Y.; GAIKWAD, S.; GOTTWALD-HOSTALEK, U.; UHL, W.; RIBOT, O.; VARANASI, K. V. S.; et al. Bioequivalence evaluation in healthy volunteers: new generic formulations of Sitagliptin and Sitagliptin-Metformin fixed-dose combination compared with the originator products. Diabetes Therapy, v. 14, p. 347–362, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-022-01349-2. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36526947/.

SCHRAMM, S.; et al. Comparação entre celecoxibe genérico de 200 mg em cápsulas duras e Celebra®: estudo de bioequivalência em indivíduos saudáveis do sexo masculino e feminino, em jejum, após uma dose única. Brazilian Journal of Pain, v. 7, p. 1–8, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/brjp/a/XQ5Sxc5vbNXVMnrCjqbhYwn/?lang=en.

WANG, F. et al. Bioequivalence evaluation of generic febuxostat versus Feburic® in healthy Chinese subjects: a randomized crossover study. BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 1, 2025.

Published

2026-04-14

How to Cite

Silva, . L. B., Brito, P. H. de P., & Barros, G. B. S. (2026). Drug interchangeability: an integrative review on pharmaceutical equivalence and clinical evidence. Revista Ft, 30(157), 01-12. https://doi.org/10.69849/zp183686